As regulatory requirements continue to evolve, many fintech companies are turning to compliance automation to keep pace. Manual processes that once worked in early-stage environments are now strained by increasing complexity, higher transaction volumes, and closer regulatory scrutiny.
Automation helps streamline repetitive tasks, mitigate operational risk, and manage compliance obligations more systematically, especially for teams that need to move quickly without compromising oversight.
This article examines the role of compliance automation in the fintech space. Whether you're evaluating your first tool or reassessing your existing setup, discover how compliance automation fits into your broader risk and growth strategy.
What Is Compliance Automation?
Compliance automation is the use of software and systems to automate regulatory compliance tasks that would otherwise require manual execution. These tasks often include customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, policy attestations, audit preparation, and regulatory reporting.
The goal isn't to remove human oversight, but to apply technology where it adds structure, consistency, and efficiency, especially in repetitive or rules-based areas.
In regulated financial sectors, like broker-dealers, RIAs, and money transmitters, compliance is a business function with legal consequences. Regulators like the SEC, FINRA, and FinCEN require that specific actions happen at specific times, with appropriate documentation and supervision.
Automation supports this by embedding compliance directly into operational systems. For example:
An onboarding workflow might trigger an automated KYC check
A transaction system could flag unusual activity in real time
A compliance dashboard might show which employees haven’t completed required attestations this quarter
Fintech companies operate at a different pace than traditional financial institutions: they scale quickly, experiment often, and rely on lean teams. That creates tension with regulatory frameworks that expect structure, control, and traceability from day one.
Compliance automation offers a way to manage obligations while minimizing disruptions to core operations. For startups, automation reduces the risk of non-compliance driven by oversight or volume. For larger fintechs, it helps maintain consistency across teams, products, and jurisdictions.
Key Benefits of Compliance Automation
Compliance automation is about equipping teams with better tools to keep up with growing demands. For fintech firms balancing rapid growth with complex regulatory oversight, automation brings structure to areas where manual effort doesn’t scale.
The main benefits of automation include:
Increased Efficiency and Reduced Manual Workload
Many fintech compliance programs are initially built on spreadsheets, email reminders, and manual checklists. That approach works until growth exposes its limits. As transaction volumes rise and regulatory requirements expand, manual methods can become a bottleneck.
Compliance automation helps reduce that friction by handling tasks that follow predictable patterns. These include recurring reviews, status tracking, document collection, user attestations, and data aggregation for audits. Instead of relying on team members to remember every deadline or step, systems can automatically trigger, assign, and track compliance actions.
This can free up compliance professionals to focus on oversight and analysis rather than routine administration. It also mitigates the risk of missed steps or inconsistent execution. Over time, automation can add operational leverage, allowing the same small team to support more products, customers, and jurisdictions without needing to expand linearly.
Better Scalability During Growth or Regulatory Complexity
As fintech companies grow, so do their compliance obligations. What starts as a narrow set of rules often expands into a multi-layered program involving federal, state, and sometimes international requirements. Manual compliance processes tend to break under that pressure.
Compliance automation provides a structured way to scale without multiplying compliance headcount at the same rate. Automated workflows can support high volumes of onboarding, daily transaction reviews, or multi-jurisdictional reporting, with minimal adjustments to the underlying processes.
This approach is beneficial for fintechs adding new products, entering new states, or preparing for licensing exams.
Reducing Risk Through Structured Execution
Manual compliance work is prone to inconsistency. A missed step in onboarding, a skipped alert in transaction monitoring, or a forgotten update to a policy log can lead to regulatory issues.
Compliance automation reduces exposure to that kind of human error. When tasks are automated, they follow predefined rules, eliminating the need for memory, judgment, or availability. Automated systems can flag exceptions, track resolution steps, and identify recurring issues. This provides better visibility and auditability while reducing the need for data tracking.
Improved Audit Readiness and Documentation
Preparing for an audit or regulatory exam can consume weeks, as teams often scramble to gather evidence, check records, and reconstruct paper trails that should have been tracked continuously.
Compliance automation supports audit readiness by capturing process data in real-time. Instead of assembling documentation retroactively, systems can automatically log actions, store relevant files, and track completion dates and responsible parties.
When done right, this creates a consistent, structured audit trail. And the organized and time-stamped information goes a long way in responding to regulator questions. Faster Detection of Compliance Risks
Delays in spotting a potential compliance issue, whether it’s a flagged transaction, an incomplete onboarding, or an internal policy lapse, can lead to larger issues down the line.
Compliance automation often includes systems to surface potential risks as soon as they appear. Rules can be configured to trigger alerts based on specific thresholds, timelines, or anomalies. That means teams can act faster, rather than waiting for a quarterly review or external audit to uncover a problem.
This kind of real-time monitoring is especially useful in areas like AML, where patterns can shift quickly and volume makes manual oversight impractical.
Learn how AML transaction monitoring works in our article →
Competitive Advantage and Partner Trust
A strong compliance program isn’t just a regulatory requirement; it is also a signal. Investors, banking partners, and enterprise clients often assess a fintech’s risk profile before doing business. They look for operational maturity, documented controls, and the ability to respond quickly to compliance questions.
Compliance automation facilitates transparency, standardizes reporting, and demonstrates internal discipline. Instead of explaining how things should work, companies can show how things do work, backed by system logs, audit trails, and measurable activity.
This kind of visibility builds confidence. It shortens due diligence timelines, strengthens bank-fintech partnerships, and shows regulators that compliance is not an afterthought.
Core Technologies Behind Compliance Automation
Compliance automation isn’t a single tool. It’s a collection of technologies working together to support specific regulatory workflows.
Some of the key technologies used in compliance automation are:
Workflow Automation and RPA: These tools execute routine compliance tasks based on preset logic. Common applications include assigning policy attestations, scheduling recurring reviews, or routing approvals. By automating these actions, teams reduce reliance on manual checklists and improve consistency across the board.
APIs and System Integrations: API-driven integrations allow compliance tools to connect directly with onboarding systems, CRMs, transaction platforms, and cloud infrastructure. This enables real-time compliance checks during customer activity, reducing the need for duplicate data entry and delayed reporting.
AI and Machine Learning in Compliance Contexts: AI helps detect anomalies, evaluate risk, and process large volumes of data faster than rule-based systems alone. It’s especially relevant in areas like transaction monitoring, identity verification, and adverse media screening, although oversight is still required to accurately interpret the results.
Real-Time Dashboards and Alerting: Dashboards provide live visibility into compliance operations. They display status updates, unresolved issues, and policy violations in one place. Alerting functions notify relevant team members when controls fail, deadlines approach, or thresholds are crossed.
Cloud-Based Compliance Platforms: These systems centralize workflows, documentation, user access, and audit trails. Being cloud-based means they’re accessible across teams and locations, with built-in version control, automation modules, and reporting tools that support cross-functional collaboration.
Practical Use Cases in Fintech Compliance
The value of compliance automation becomes clearer when applied to specific workflows. Below are some of the most common use cases where automation supports compliance in a fintech setting.
Automated KYC/KYB Onboarding
Customer onboarding is one of the first compliance checkpoints in a fintech product. Know Your Customer (KYC) and Know Your Business (KYB) requirements demand identity verification, sanctions screening, and risk assessments before accounts can be activated.
Automating this workflow helps manage high onboarding volume without compromising required steps. Systems can verify ID documents, screen names against sanctions lists, and perform database checks in seconds. For KYB, automation can pull business registration data and flag ownership structures that require additional due diligence.
This reduces delays and manual effort, especially in peak onboarding periods. It also improves documentation quality, since actions and outcomes are logged at each step. Most importantly, it helps teams apply policies consistently, even as product lines or customer types expand.
Regly’s KYC module helps fintech teams verify individuals and businesses, flag potential risks, and document every step of the onboarding process. Learn more or request a demo →
Real-Time AML Transaction Monitoring
Anti-money laundering (AML) compliance is about detecting suspicious activity quickly. Traditional approaches, such as reviews, fixed rules, and after-the-fact analysis, often struggle to keep up with real-time transaction volumes, especially on fintech platforms operating at scale.
Compliance automation brings speed and structure to AML monitoring. Systems can evaluate patterns across accounts, flag anomalies based on behavior or thresholds, and escalate risks for review. This includes monitoring for structuring, high-risk geographies, unusual transaction sizes, or sudden shifts in activity.
Automation helps surface relevant risk faster, so teams spend less time reviewing noise and more time investigating actual threats.
Regly’s AI-powered transaction monitoring software aims to help identify risk patterns, trigger alerts, and route flagged items to the right reviewer. Learn more →
Sanctions and PEP List Screening
Screening customers against global sanctions lists and politically exposed person (PEP) databases is a baseline compliance requirement across most regulated fintech sectors. Whether you're onboarding retail users or institutional clients, regulators expect you to monitor for high-risk individuals from day one.
Compliance automation simplifies this by integrating real-time screening directly into onboarding and transaction workflows. Instead of relying on periodic batch reviews, systems can check customer details against updated watchlists as part of the standard process.
Regulatory Reporting Automation
Agencies like the SEC, FINRA, FinCEN, or state regulators typically require regulated fintechs to submit reports on a recurring basis or in response to specific events. These filings are detailed, time-sensitive, and often data-heavy.
Compliance automation can help by pulling the required data from internal systems, formatting it to match regulatory specifications, and routing it for internal review or submission. This reduces the need for ad hoc data requests or last-minute report building.
Automated reporting workflows can also improve consistency across filings. Rather than re-assembling the logic each quarter or during exams, teams can rely on predefined templates and audit-ready output.
Marketing and Communication Reviews
Marketing compliance has become increasingly complex, especially under the updated SEC Marketing Rule. For fintech companies offering regulated products, marketing content regulated by the SEC Marketing Rule includes website copy, emails, social media posts, investor materials, and product messaging, especially when financial performance, pricing, or legal claims are involved.
Compliance automation can support this review process by flagging specific phrases, disclaimers, or risk terms based on preconfigured rules. Teams can route content through review workflows, document approvals, and log final versions for audit readiness.
While final judgment still rests with a compliance officer, automation reduces review time, enforces consistency, and ensures key content doesn’t go live without the right sign-offs.
Regly’s marketing compliance software helps teams flag risk language, simplify review workflows, and archive approved content with clear audit trails. See how it works →
Policy Management and Attestations
Fintech companies are expected to maintain up-to-date compliance policies and confirm that employees understand them. This includes formal acknowledgments for policies related to AML, cybersecurity, trading, social media use, and more.
As headcount grows or regulatory complexity increases, manual tracking of attestations can become unsustainable. Compliance automation addresses this by triggering reviews on a predefined schedule, assigning attestations to specific employees, and automatically tracking completion.
Automated policy management also allows for easier version control, centralized access, and streamlined audit documentation. Therefore, the system can provide a timestamped record for a regulator or internal auditor who asks by whom and when the latest AML policy was reviewed.
As fintech teams grow, Regly’s policy management tools make it easier to stay on top of version control, employee attestations, and distribution across departments. Learn more →
Insider Trading Surveillance
For fintech companies that handle investment data, manage portfolios, or operate under SEC and FINRA oversight, insider trading surveillance is a core compliance requirement. Teams must monitor employee and affiliate trading activity to detect potential misuse of material nonpublic information (MNPI). This includes situations where staff may have access to early-stage investment insights, pricing data, or corporate announcements not yet available to the public.
Manual oversight, like spot-checking trades or maintaining blackout calendars in a spreadsheet, can be difficult to scale. Compliance automation strengthens this process by monitoring transactions in real time, cross-referencing against restricted securities lists, and alerting teams to potential policy violations. Trade approvals and exceptions can be logged automatically, creating an auditable trail that satisfies internal controls and regulatory expectations.
Third-Party and Vendor Risk Workflows
Fintech firms rely heavily on third-party vendors, from payment processors and KYC providers to cloud hosting and marketing tools. These relationships often come with regulatory expectations, especially when vendors have access to sensitive data or perform outsourced compliance functions.
Tracking vendor due diligence, risk assessments, and ongoing oversight manually can lead to gaps and missed deadlines. Compliance automation helps streamline this by:
Centralizing vendor documentation and contact details
Triggering periodic reviews and risk assessments
Assigning follow-ups for missing items or expiring certifications
Logging activities for audit-readiness
This creates a structured approach to vendor oversight that scales with the increasing number of partners. It also supports transparency if a regulator asks how a fintech manages third-party risk.
Regly’s vendor compliance tools help fintechs organize vendor documentation, schedule ongoing reviews, and track due diligence workflows with audit-ready logs. Learn more →
Regulatory Considerations Around Compliance Automation
As fintech companies adopt compliance automation tools, regulatory expectations remain as high as ever. Automation can support faster reviews, better documentation, and more scalable processes, but it doesn’t reduce accountability.
What Regulators Expect
Regulators generally recognize the value of automation when used appropriately. The SEC, FINRA, FinCEN, and state agencies don’t oppose technology adoption, but they expect firms to apply the same risk management standards to automated processes that they would to any other critical function.
That means fintechs must write policies that reflect how automation works, train staff to monitor and escalate issues, and explain how decisions are made, especially when those decisions affect customers or trigger reporting obligations.
Automation does not eliminate liability for noncompliance. The business remains responsible even if noncompliance stems from a configuration error or a software failure.
“Technology-Neutral” Supervision (You’re Still Accountable)
Most regulators take a “technology-neutral” approach, meaning they prioritize outcomes over the methods used to achieve them. Whether compliance is manual, automated, or AI-supported, the underlying expectations remain the same: fintechs must follow policies, maintain accurate records, and ensure customer protections.
In practice, this means that fintechs must establish governance frameworks that treat automation as an integral part of the compliance function, rather than a substitute for it. For example, if a fintech uses automated systems to flag suspicious transactions or route marketing materials for review, it must still validate that these systems function properly and align with regulatory standards.
Using AI in Compliance: Oversight, Explainability, and Bias
Regulators expect firms to treat AI models like any other critical system: with documented oversight, regular testing, and clear lines of accountability. This includes knowing how the model works, what data it uses, and what logic it applies when flagging risks or making recommendations.
Explainability is essential. If an AI tool flags a transaction or approves marketing language, compliance teams must be able to justify their reasoning. Black-box models that can’t be interpreted or justified don’t align with regulatory expectations, especially if they influence decisions tied to customer outcomes or disclosures.
Bias is another area of scrutiny. AI models trained on biased datasets or applied without review can introduce fairness issues, especially in onboarding, risk scoring, or fraud detection. Fintech firms are expected to monitor for this and adjust models as needed.
Automation can support compliance, but a business is still responsible for the oversight. That means human review, clear documentation, and the ability to defend the system’s behavior during audits or enforcement inquiries.
Vendor Selection and Model Risk Management
When fintech companies use third-party tools for compliance automation, especially those incorporating AI or decision-support logic, they inherit a layer of risk. Regulators have made it clear: outsourcing does not outsource accountability.
That means vendor selection, onboarding, and monitoring must follow structured protocols. This includes documenting the purpose of the tool, evaluating the vendor’s controls, and understanding the model’s functionality, particularly if it impacts risk scoring, transaction reviews, or customer decisions.
Firms should also implement a model risk management framework. This typically involves assessing inputs, testing outputs, and reviewing for bias or drift over time. If the model changes or re-trains itself, compliance teams need a process to evaluate the impact on decision-making.
Clear documentation, validation procedures, and periodic reassessments are critical, especially when automation is used in high-stakes areas like AML, KYC, or marketing review. Without these controls, even a minor misconfiguration or unexamined model update could raise red flags during an exam.
How to Evaluate a Compliance Automation Platform
Whether you're launching an RIA, scaling a payments platform, or offering embedded finance features, your compliance tech needs to match your product model and regulatory footprint.
Here are the key aspects to evaluate when choosing a platform:
Must-Have Features by Business Model
Compliance risks differ significantly across fintech business models. Choosing the right automation platform means mapping features to your regulatory exposure:
Digital Broker-Dealers and RIAs: These firms need tools that are aligned with SEC and FINRA rules. Prioritize marketing review modules that support the SEC Marketing Rule, insider trading surveillance, and audit-tracked approvals. Centralized document control and policy attestations are also essential for exams and internal audits.
Lenders and BNPL Platforms: For lending-focused fintechs, automation should support customer identity verification (KYC/KYB), loan disclosures, adverse action notices, and fraud prevention. Integrations with CRM and communications logs are key for documenting decisions and interactions.
Crypto and Web3 Companies: Crypto firms face heightened expectations around transaction transparency and sanctions compliance, and should look for platforms that offer blockchain analytics integrations, real-time monitoring, and tools to track vendor risk.
Payments and Money Transmitters: Platforms in this category should offer real-time AML screening, jurisdiction-level license tracking, and automation for filing reports with FinCEN or state regulators. Systems should be able to adapt easily to MSB registration and ongoing BSA/AML obligations.
Neobanks and Embedded Finance Providers: These teams often operate multiple regulated functions under one roof and need flexible tools that support layered workflows, including risk scoring, onboarding, marketing compliance, and policy distribution.
Fit matters. A platform built for legacy institutions or single-use cases won’t support a fast-moving fintech stack. Start with your top compliance obligations, then assess which features will scale with your roadmap.
How to Validate Controls, Alerts, and Audit Readiness
Start by validating how the platform handles rule logic and thresholds. Can you view and edit the conditions that trigger alerts? Is there documentation of when and why an alert was generated? Platforms that offer opaque or black-box systems create risk during exams, especially if you can’t explain how a flagged issue was identified.
Look for tools that log user actions, policy versions, and decision outcomes in a way that’s accessible to reviewers. This includes timestamps for approvals, escalation paths for flagged items, and records of user attestations or overrides. Ideally, audit logs should be exportable, searchable, and linked to the original workflow for context.
Finally, test the platform’s reporting output. Regulators often ask for evidence of control effectiveness, not just policy language. You should be able to produce reports that demonstrate how your systems operate in practice, showing not just that a rule exists, but how it’s applied, reviewed, and updated over time.
Managing Automation Without Losing Flexibility
Compliance automation works best when it integrates seamlessly with your existing workflows, rather than forcing you to rebuild them. One of the biggest risks with off-the-shelf platforms is rigidity: preconfigured rules, locked review paths, or templates that don’t accurately reflect your actual processes. That might work in static environments, but fintech moves fast.
Look for systems that offer flexible configuration without excessive engineering. You should be able to adjust thresholds, define escalation paths, or modify attestation flows without vendor intervention. This is especially important for fintech teams that frequently iterate on their product, target new customer segments, or expand into new jurisdictions.
Your automation tools should support changes in policy, staffing, or product design without requiring a compliance reset. That includes the ability to clone workflows, assign access by role or entity, and update logic as your risk appetite evolves.
Benefits of Using Regly
Regly is an AI-powered compliance management platform explicitly designed for fintech and regulated financial firms. Unlike generic compliance tools, Regly is built on a decade of hands-on experience from InnReg, a consulting firm trusted by over 100 fintech companies since 2013.
Regly is built around the complexities of real-world compliance programs, including those involving tokenized assets, crypto integrations, and multi-jurisdictional licensing.
Our tool is:
Powered by AI and Automation: Regly reduces the need for manual reviews, spreadsheets, and ad hoc approvals with intelligent automation. It flags risk language, routes tasks based on escalation logic, and generates audit-ready reports, all while reducing review cycles and compliance busywork.
Configurable and Scalable: Whether you're a growth-stage startup or an enterprise-level fintech, Regly offers workflows and rule sets that are configurable without developer support. You can adapt thresholds, modify logic, or update workflows as your business model or regulatory exposure evolves.
Built for Collaboration: Regly brings policy attestations, approvals, reviews, and documentation into a single platform. Legal, compliance, and operations teams can coordinate in real time, tracking changes, surfacing gaps, and documenting outcomes with complete transparency.
Ready to Get Started?
Schedule a demo today and find out how Regly can help your business.